Message-ID: <28920383.1075840434683.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT) From: l..dinari@enron.com To: g..barkowsky@enron.com, clarissa.garcia@enron.com, j..farmer@enron.com Subject: RE: EPGT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dinari, Sabra L. X-To: Barkowsky, Gloria G. , Garcia, Clarissa , Farmer, Daren J. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Farmer, Darren\Logistics X-Origin: FARMER-D X-FileName: darren farmer 6-26-02.pst Gloria, the difference between the two pipes for July 2000 is the actuals came in lower than what was nominated and scheduled on MOPS. There isn't anything we can do about that difference, hopefully there is some kind of OBA that takes those variances. Sabra -----Original Message----- From: Barkowsky, Gloria G. Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:50 PM To: Garcia, Clarissa; Farmer, Daren J.; Dinari, Sabra L. Subject: EPGT Clarissa - Thanks so much for all your help with this pipe! Everything looks great. I just have a couple of paths that I need to finish it: January 2000 - I need deal #854688 pathed for EPGT and for TETC. According to the invoice, we should have 11,129 dth on the interconnect. February 2000 - I need deal #871184 pathed for HPL and CHAN. HPL should have 3,600 dth and CHAN should have 11,500 dth on the interconnect. July 2000 - Deal #871172 has an interconnect issue. According to MOPS contract #105124, they received 8,275 dth on the Matagorda 624, but according to EPGT, they delivered 10,362 dth to HPL (?) Could this possibly need to be split somehow, or do you have any other ideas? Let me know. Thanks, Gloria 3-7118