Message-ID: <174990.1075854137577.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT) From: robert.lloyd@enron.com To: pat.clynes@enron.com Subject: Re: Valero -- Meter 8018 Cc: daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com X-From: Robert E Lloyd X-To: Pat Clynes X-cc: Daren J Farmer, Robert E Lloyd X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Logistics X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf Does it make a difference if the information is communicated via a copy of customer "force majeure" letter or should it only be communicated via notes mail. There are several ways to communicate effectively issues that is beneficial to other departments, do you have a preference? Enron North America Corp. From: Pat Clynes @ ENRON 08/29/2000 10:13 PM To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Valero -- Meter 8018 Robert, This is an idea of the type of information that should be communicated. Thanks, Pat Daren J Farmer@ECT 01/27/2000 03:23 PM To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018 FYI. We need to make sure that this kind of communication conitinues to flow downstream. D ---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/27/2000 03:22 PM --------------------------- Kenneth Seaman 01/27/2000 02:00 PM To: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Valero -- Meter 8018 Deliveries to this meter were halted late in the day of January 20. The customer has maintenance issues that necessitated an earlier than planned turnaround. It is my understanding from our trader this is another force majure situation resulting in no sale or buyback at this meter commencing with the shutdown. Please take this into consideration when allocating and billing the customer. Thanks