Message-ID: <17953289.1075854150923.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 02:16:00 -0800 (PST) From: daren.farmer@enron.com To: jackie.young@enron.com Subject: Re: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Daren J Farmer X-To: Jackie Young X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf Jackie, Please get with the East Desk on this. If they agree, we can roll the deal. D Jackie Young 11/01/2000 10:03 AM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: 6/4/99 and 6/9/99 (98-0439) Enerfin TETCO Daren, On the above mentioned dates, there was no nomination at the Enerfin meter. 6/3/99 and 6/8/99 revealed activity for ENA (202K). Can the deal be extended for 6/4 (548 dec.) and 6/9 (40 dec.) to cover this flow so that Volume Management can create an accounting arrangement for these two days? Thanks -Jackie- 3-9497