Message-ID: <3283792.1075859102366.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:44:36 -0800 (PST) From: j..farmer@enron.com To: sherlyn.schumack@enron.com Subject: RE: Deal 93836 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Farmer, Daren J. X-To: Schumack, Sherlyn X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jan2002\Farmer, Daren J.\Sent Items X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer (Non-Privileged).pst I sent an e-mail to anthony campos on the 19th asking him to change the counterparty. I don't have the access to do that. If he can change the name, then we won't have to create a new deal and re-path. I just sent him another message today. D -----Original Message----- From: Schumack, Sherlyn Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:21 PM To: Farmer, Daren J. Subject: FW: Deal 93836 Daren, Have you had a chance to look at this yet? -----Original Message----- From: Schumack, Sherlyn Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:50 AM To: Farmer, Daren J. Subject: FW: Deal 93836 Daren, Will you let me know when this change has been made? I need to get some payments finaled by 3pm tomorrow. -----Original Message----- From: Schumack, Sherlyn Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:08 PM To: Farmer, Daren J. Subject: RE: Deal 93836 Prior to 7/99 this was ENA not HPL, but there may be some issues on it as well for 3/99 to 6/99. The deal ticket we used was 62717. I will have to look further into the ENA activity because I know we still have some invoices that were paid under one company and we still have drafts under the other. -----Original Message----- From: Farmer, Daren J. Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:42 AM To: Schumack, Sherlyn Subject: RE: Deal 93836 This ticket starts with 7/99 production. How were all of the other months paid? D -----Original Message----- From: Schumack, Sherlyn Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:32 AM To: Farmer, Daren J. Subject: Deal 93836 Daren, I am trying to get some payments out to Williams for old months 11/2000 and 1/2001 but global counterparty said this deal should have Black Marlin Pipeline Company Inc. instead of Black Marlin Pipeline Company effective 3/99. The Black Marlin Pipeline Company was for an internal record (when it was an Enron entity).