Message-ID: <14712776.1075840443838.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:44:00 -0700 (PDT) From: hollis.kimbrough@enron.com To: ilan.caplan@enron.com Subject: Re: Weekly Report vs. O&M Report Cc: mark.fisher@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: mark.fisher@enron.com X-From: Hollis Kimbrough X-To: Ilan Caplan X-cc: Mark Fisher X-bcc: X-Folder: \mark fischer 7-12-02\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: FISCHER-M X-FileName: mark fischer 7-12-02 LNotes.nsf Ilan, I was incorrect in what I told you earlier today regarding the types of availability data included in these two reports. What I told you was that both reports include the "EA" (Enron Availability) term and they should be the same. When I checked this out I discovered that the O&M Report provides the contractual availability and not "EA". The MOOP is mislabeled and should correspond to the Owners Report. We will fix this error on the next report. I apologize for the confusion. Hollis From: Ilan Caplan on 04/16/2002 11:16 AM To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Weekly Report vs. O&M Report Hollis - Per the phone conversation earlier today, below is a chart exhibiting the differences between the Monthly Operational Report (Mark Fisher) and the Weekly MTD (John Ruiz) numbers posted on the web. Both cases should include the numbers through the end of the month. From what we discussed, my understanding is that the chart should pool from the same source. Please let me know if I am viewing this information incorrectly. Thanks, Ilan