Message-ID: <23071540.1075840442241.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 05:19:00 -0800 (PST) From: matthew.meyers@enron.com To: mark.fisher@enron.com Subject: Re: Work Request 574 Cc: hollis.kimbrough@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: hollis.kimbrough@enron.com X-From: Matthew Meyers X-To: Mark Fisher X-cc: Hollis Kimbrough X-bcc: X-Folder: \mark fischer 7-12-02\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: FISCHER-M X-FileName: mark fischer 7-12-02 LNotes.nsf Greetings Mark, Please add these four files to your finished deliverable for work request 574. Indian Mesa (Clear Sky) met data for towers 0652 & 0653 are attached. Rich usually likes working with the raw data files. Since the February files start on 2/2, the January files (ending on 2/2) are included. Let me know if you have any questions. Matt Meyers ---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron on 03/21/2002 01:34 PM --------------------------- Hollis Kimbrough 03/21/2002 11:47 AM To: Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Work Request Matt, Please package the data in hourly format (see Kurt's e-mail below). As soon as we have Mark's part please combine the two outputs and send them to Kurt. Thanks, Hollis ---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 03/21/2002 11:58 AM --------------------------- Kurt Anderson 03/21/2002 11:43 AM To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Work Request Thank you very much Hollis. I apologize for the mistake on the form. I have not spoken to the owner, not for lack of trying I might add. I think we should move forward using hourly data. If this is unacceptable and will result in a lot of work for what could be of little value than proceed as you see fit. I will continue to attempt to reach the owner to obtain guidance on this issue. Again, I appreciate your support on this task. KA Hollis Kimbrough 03/21/2002 09:44 AM To: Information Services@ENRON cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron, Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON Subject: Work Request Please see attached. Kurt - I changed the date to correct the typo. It now reads 2/1/02 through 2/28/02 versus the previous 2/1/02 through 2/1/02 date. I also changed the wind requirement to read "average" wind speed dropping the 10 minute data requirement. The second issue is still outstanding with regard to being acceptable. Can Rich use hourly data or not? An alternative would be to provide nacelle mounted anemometer data for each turbine on a 10 minute basis - would that be helpful? Regards, Hollis