Message-ID: <16111570.1075842519266.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 13:34:00 -0800 (PST) From: drew.fossum@enron.com To: drew.fossum@enron.com Subject: Re: daily firm on TW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Drew Fossum X-To: Drew Fossum X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf check with susan on the daily issue--did we test the reason behind our daily limit? If we can do one month deals, why not 12 month? ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/09/2000 09:33 PM --------------------------- From: Mary Kay Miller 03/09/2000 05:52 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Darveaux, Glen Hass Subject: Re: daily firm on TW I thought we had worked on some revised language, because we had a concern when the agreement indicated the discount was available for the month. Glen was working with you on this I believe. MK From: Susan Scott 03/09/2000 11:44 AM To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON cc: Subject: daily firm on TW The Commercial Group has asked whether they can sell daily firm for longer than a 3-month period. This phrasing is of course misleading; TW's daily firm contracts are always for a term of just one day, but renew for consecutive one-day terms unless terminated. The discount letter, on the other hand, grants a discounted rate for each of the one-day terms for a certain period of time (typically one month). Steve Harris wants to be able to "sell daily firm for a one-year period." In contractual terms all this would mean is that the contract is for renewabable one-day terms (as usual), and the discount applicable to such terms would be effective for one year. I see no problem with this, do you? (Apparently the current perception in marketing is that regulatory/legal was limiting daily firm to a 3-month period.)