Message-ID: <23113205.1075842522191.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 08:53:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: Re: responding to USGT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Susan Scott
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Inspiring letter.  My few changes attached.







   
	
	
	From:  Susan Scott                           01/17/2000 04:27 PM
	

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: responding to USGT

Drew, here is a draft of a letter responding to USGT's with regard to the 
unpaid invoice for alternate points.  Thought I would see if you have any 
comments before I pass it along to Mr. Fawcett.  With regard to my reference 
to our Errors in Billing tariff provision, I was torn between backing up my 
statement vs. pointing them to potentially troublesome language (ie "mutual 
mistake"), but figured they would ask for the tariff provision so I included 
it.  Also, Elsa really attacks us for not billing them previously so I 
thought I should address that.   Let me know what you think.