Message-ID: <9596616.1075842424853.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 02:49:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: mary.miller@enron.com
Subject: Re: Form 2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Mary Kay Miller
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Great.  The footnote issue scares me.   If we just use the same footnotes as 
a matter of convenience, we may have some flexibility.  DF


   
	
	
	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           02/07/2000 09:26 AM
	

To: Drew Fossum
cc:  

Subject: Form 2

Per Tim's discussion with Chandler, they do not attach the brown cover, but 
the footnotes used in the brown cover match the footnotes used in the Form 
2.  therein lies the potential problem.  
He also asked for the list of who receives the Borwn cover, Chandler has to 
get from Treasury, which he said they don't like to do.  I told TIm  to 
pursue in the regard it is needed for Conoco litiagation.

MK