Message-ID: <19462034.1075842532033.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:17:00 -0800 (PST) From: drew.fossum@enron.com To: julie.armstrong@enron.com Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not found) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Drew Fossum X-To: Julie Armstrong X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf Julie--pls forward to Danny. I've had trouble the last couple of days getting emails to go through to him. Am I doing something wrong? ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/20/2000 11:13 AM --------------------------- Mail Delivery Subsystem on 12/20/2000 10:12:07 AM To: cc: Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not found) The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:12:07 GMT from [172.28.10.39] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 ... Host unknown (Name server: enron: host not found) ----- Original message follows ----- Return-Path: Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39]) by postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id QAA12391 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:12:07 GMT From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:12:03 -0600 Subject: Re: Gallup Mods To: Stanley.Horton@enron.com Cc: Danny.McCarty@Enron, Phil.Lowry@enron.com, Steven.Harris@enron.com, Mary.Kay.Miller@enron.com, Keith.Petersen@enron.com Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:11:55 -0600 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 12/20/2000 10:11:39 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Absolutely. I got a report yesterday on the 30-40 million/day that Phil and his guys may be able to squeeze out of the system with debottlenecking etc. We'll be ready to go to expedite any approvals that may be necessary on that project. On the quick 10 million/day that we've been working on, there's a potential alternative to building more Gallup horsepower that may get us the 10 million much quicker and at a lower cost. Steve Harris and I talked about it yesterday and I hope we can run it to ground in a day or two. We will be ready to file at FERC shortly on the 15,000 hp at Gallup if the alternative doesn't pan out. We'll look at combining the 30-40 mm/d project with the Gallup compression for FERC filing purposes. DF Stanley Horton 12/19/2000 06:15 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S@Enron ., Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Gallup Mods (Document link: Drew Fossum) Lets make sure we are picking-up on the other ideas Phil has for getting additional capacity on Tw. If any of his ideas require regulatory approval we will probably want to include in the same certificate application.