Message-ID: <4763369.1075842423009.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 06:53:00 -0800 (PST) From: drew.fossum@enron.com To: bill.cordes@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com Subject: PG&E: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Cc: louis.soldano@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: louis.soldano@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com X-From: Drew Fossum X-To: Bill Cordes, Steven Harris X-cc: Louis Soldano, Susan Scott X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf Bill, attached is a memo prepared by Susan Scott that does a good job of answering the several questions that you had about the situation at Topock. Note that in Susan's first answer, PG&E has no obligation to Transwestern to accept gas at Topock. They may well have obligations to their own transportation customers or sales customers that have to be satisfied with Topock receipts, but that doesn't give TW any rights against PG&E. I realize these are not comforting answers, but I wanted us all to have a realistic understanding of where we are. I'm running this by Lou in case he has a different spin on the history or the agreements. Thanks. DF ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/11/2000 02:44 PM ---------------------------