Message-ID: <10521044.1075842459013.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 07:10:00 -0700 (PDT) From: drew.fossum@enron.com To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, rockey.storie@enron.com Subject: Power plants Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Drew Fossum X-To: Kevin Hyatt, Lorraine Lindberg, Rockey Storie X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf These guys don't give up. I'll forward any information Tino gives me on their latest DOE strategy. Rockey--do you have any interest in following up on Tino's Wichita project?? I don't know how far it is from any of our lines, but it may be worth a chat. DF ---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/30/2000 02:08 PM --------------------------- Tino Monaldo on 06/30/2000 01:05:37 PM To: "'dfossum@enron.com'" cc: Subject: Power plants Sorry you are feedling bad. Hope reading email doesn't hurt. I'll try and be brief. 1. We have an opportunity to acquire a? 35MW? cogeneration facility in Kansas that is from the early 1980's and rarely used. We may want to talk about a? joint project. Can I borrow some expertise via a phone call fom you to your electric gurus to let me know what the spot market into KC and Wichita looks like. 2. I met with DML and we intend to propose a deal that has us charging only for the generation and for DOE to assumme the risk and or reward of the cost of gas.Before you have any conversations with Dennis or your folks give me a call so we can flesh this out. We have DOE meetings scheduled for 7/24-25th so it is a busy month. Our consultant's are reviewing the DOE data we? received. I''l let you? know what we learn.They may have a bigger steam load than I would have guessed.