Message-ID: <32078615.1075842484047.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:29:00 -0800 (PST) From: jim.talcott@enron.com To: mary.miller@enron.com, tim.kissner@enron.com, mike.mcgowan@enron.com, drew.fossum@enron.com, fkelly@gbmdc.com Subject: Inside FERC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Jim Talcott X-To: Mary Kay Miller, Tim Kissner, Mike McGowan, Drew Fossum, fkelly@gbmdc.com X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf Rob Marvin of Inside FERC called for Mary Kay today with a couple questions. I reviewed them with Mary Kay and reported back to him. He wanted to know what "Settlement Amount" and "Net Settlement Payment Due" meant on the schedules. I told him "Settlement Amount" was the Kansas ad valorem tax refund obligation due under the Settlement, and that the "Net Settlement Payment Due" was what was remaining due if the producer had already paid money to Northern. He then asked how the "Settlement Amount" was calculated and I told him that was subject to settlement negotiation privilege and that the parties agreed not to disclose any calculations or formulas in the Settlement. Jrt