Message-ID: <20667268.1075842498316.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 01:08:00 -0700 (PDT) From: drew.fossum@enron.com To: jim.talcott@enron.com Subject: Re: DUKE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Drew Fossum X-To: Jim Talcott X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: FOSSUM-D X-FileName: dfossum.nsf OUTSTANDING! I may use it word for word! Thanks--I'll call him shortly and let you know how it goes. DF Jim Talcott 05/02/2000 02:27 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: DUKE Hey, the day's slippping away and I remember how yesterday went. (Remember Kimball?) I have a meeting with MKM and FX from 3-5 on the May 9 meeting in KC, so here are my thoughts on the call to Foglar: "Hey Murray, this is Drew. We received the Chisos complaint and I thought I'd get ahold of you and see if there is any appetite at Duke to sit down and discuss resolving these issues in lieu of spending a lot of money on motions in Pecos County" Grunt. "I am curious whether the pleading is evidence that Duke/Chisos are not interested in resolving this outside the courts, or is it just a natural reaction to our letter; a move to bring Northern to the table?" Grunt. "Is Chisos serious about litigating this?" Grunt. "If Northern and Duke were to get together in the next 3 weeks, do you think it would make sense for Chisos to also attend? Who do you think Duke would send?" Grunt. "Do you think Chisos would hold off on serving the petition pending discussions?" I can't think of much else to say/ask. jrt