Message-ID: <4854143.1075840485227.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:10:37 -0700 (PDT) From: lisa.gang@enron.com To: jennifer.thome@enron.com Subject: RE: BPA - Dec. 2001 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Gang, Lisa X-To: Thome, Jennifer X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Gang, Lisa\Sent Items X-Origin: GANG-L X-FileName: lisa gang 6-25-02.pst According to the scheduling sheet, deal#380414 is 400mw total. This is a 50 mw deal. 25mw was booked out and 25 mw was physical under pwx tag. Deal#381345 should be 600mw. Hope this helps... lisa -----Original Message----- From: Thome, Jennifer Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:05 PM To: Gang, Lisa Subject: BPA - Dec. 2001 Lisa: Houston found another small dispute for Dec. 2001 with BPA. Please see the attached. In sum, based on BPA's figures, it looks like we doubled up by adding numbers from the 25th to numbers for the 26th (hence, doubling the 26th) According to them: 12/26 Deal 381345 = 600 MW total (not 1200) Deal 380414.1 = 200 MW total (not 400) Please check the scheduling sheets and let me know if you agree. Thanks! Jenny << File: Dec. - BPA final dispute.xls >>