Message-ID: <27215307.1075862424117.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:31:23 -0800 (PST) From: nancy.carpenter@enron.com To: james.weitekamp@enron.com, tracy.geaccone@enron.com Subject: IT 2001 C.E. vs 2002 Plan Cc: tony.mayer@enron.com, amy.krone@enron.com, caroline.barnes@enron.com, nancy.carpenter@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: tony.mayer@enron.com, amy.krone@enron.com, caroline.barnes@enron.com, nancy.carpenter@enron.com X-From: Carpenter, Nancy X-To: Weitekamp, James , Geaccone, Tracy X-cc: Mayer, Tony , Krone, Amy , Barnes, Caroline , Carpenter, Nancy X-bcc: X-Folder: \TGEACCO (Non-Privileged)\Geaccone, Tracy\Inbox X-Origin: Geaccone-T X-FileName: TGEACCO (Non-Privileged).pst James, For NNG IT, the Capital is up $2.2MM due to new projects and new business. For NNG & TW, the primary explanations for the net increases in Direct Support are: Risk Management moved from Commercial to IT $.3MM SAN $.3MM O&E Additional Support (staff) and new software $.8MM Amortization - Future Vision Projects $.3MM EPSC $.7MM Totals to $2.4MM The FA&A ETS Support variance (Measurement) is incorrect on the worksheet: 2001 C.E. is $1.6MM, 2002 Plan is $1.5MM. I'll get Gas Logistics to you soon. Thanks, Nancy