Message-ID: <25143348.1075862425846.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 12:33:40 -0800 (PST) From: elaine.concklin@enron.com To: patricia.wiederholt@enron.com, tracy.geaccone@enron.com Subject: Forecast for MGT Cc: kim.phan@enron.com, jason.ruckle@enron.com, mike.zabawa@enron.com, cheryl.perchal@enron.com, rositza.smilenova@enron.com, david.clements@enron.com, james.weitekamp@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: kim.phan@enron.com, jason.ruckle@enron.com, mike.zabawa@enron.com, cheryl.perchal@enron.com, rositza.smilenova@enron.com, david.clements@enron.com, james.weitekamp@enron.com X-From: Concklin, Elaine X-To: Wiederholt, Patricia , Geaccone, Tracy X-cc: Phan, Kim , Ruckle, Jason , Zabawa, Mike , Perchal, Cheryl , Smilenova, Rositza , Clements, David , Weitekamp, James X-bcc: X-Folder: \TGEACCO (Non-Privileged)\Geaccone, Tracy\Inbox X-Origin: Geaccone-T X-FileName: TGEACCO (Non-Privileged).pst At Third Current Estimate, we added a full year forecast for MGT for Operations and added the MGT and Border amounts together on the Border page in the ETS Functional Income Statement as instructed. We are trying to confirm what we should be reflecting. Jason is being instructed that ETS should not pick up any actuals for January through May, and that we should use Actuals received from El Paso for June forward, and not our numbers. The El Paso amounts for June through September are close to what we have, but not exact. Please advise us as to what we should be reflecting and we will revise our schedules. We did not pick up MGT at all until 3rd CE, so I'm OK with restating 3rd CE to reflect the appropriate amounts for MGT and rolling forward from there. Thanks, Elaine Elaine Concklin Enron Transportation Services Director Financial Planning Operations Support Services 1400 Smith St. Suite 3AC-3311 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 853-5521 Elaine.Concklin@Enron.com