Message-ID: <14667491.1075853851822.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:51:00 -0800 (PST) From: chris.germany@enron.com To: judy.townsend@enron.com Subject: Storage Demand Issue Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Chris Germany X-To: Judy Townsend X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf We know about this don't we Judith!!! ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:51 PM --------------------------- Brenda H Fletcher 01/12/2000 09:19 AM To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Storage Demand Issue FYI - You may already be aware of this but I'm passing this on in case you didn't know this. BF ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:08 AM --------------------------- From: Dave Nommensen on 01/10/2000 02:02 PM To: Jeff Coates/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue Storage deals require a meter on both the injection side and the withdrawal side in order to bridge - even if there is only a demand charge. A zone is not enough, it must have a meter. Let me know if that works. d.n. Enron North America Corp. From: Jeff Coates 01/10/2000 01:52 PM To: Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Storage Demand Issue The deal was entered on friday 1/7, and your right it never bridged over to Unify. I don't understand the location question, the deal was set up like all other storage tickets. I'm just trying to get the demand to download so VM can draft it.