Message-ID: <28153415.1075853829787.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:36:00 -0700 (PDT) From: chris.germany@enron.com To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage Cc: scott.goodell@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: scott.goodell@enron.com X-From: Chris Germany X-To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON X-cc: Scott Goodell X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf Chic-fil-a??? No problem 4,053,906 sounds good. jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/25/2000 07:10:13 AM To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" cc: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" , " - *Kinney, Doug" Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage CG-would you be willing to agree to my number of 4,053,906? It would help much with the storage documentation for the sale to NPC. Lunch at Chik-fil-a is on me. Thanks. Chris.Germany@enron.com on 08/23/2000 03:45:38 PM Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Scott.Goodell@enron.com Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage AND my COH balance effective 7/31/2000 is 4,053.932 ( a difference of 26dt's). Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 08/23/2000 02:15:45 PM To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage Here are the theoretical storage volumes based on the schedule, not noms... MSQ schd Theoretical Balance (Embedded image moved to file: pic14354.pcx) jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/23/2000 01:27:23 PM To: " - *Kinney, Doug" , " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" , " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" cc: Subject: Theoretical Storage We need to reach an agreement on the theoretical storage as CES needs to transfer to NPC a specific volume and price for COH, and AGL ESS, WSS and Sonat. I had thought we had an understanding that CES would be billed, per Melissa's memo of 3/15 and conversations during June, the percentages times the current month's storage capacity. We may have confused you by sending FOM noms for storage injections that were different than that formula, and Doug has noticed the bills from ENA tend to represent the noms. How should this be resolved? Should we go on ENA billed volumes or by the formula? Let me know. My calculations per the formula would give us the following balances for 7/31/00... COH-4,053,906 AGL-Sonat- 504,379 AGL-ESS-9,827 AGL-WSS-220,209 (See attached file: pic14354.pcx) - pic14354.pcx