Message-ID: <7095464.1075853706588.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 22:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: chris.germany@enron.com To: joan.veselack@enron.com Subject: Re: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Chris Germany X-To: Joan Veselack X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf I'm going to respond to everyone on the email with my comments but I just wanted to make sure I undersand the blue highlighted comments below. Please call me when you get a chance. Thanks Joan Veselack@ENRON 03/13/2000 01:06 PM To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Citygate Production GAS behind TCO - PLEASE READ Kathy, we may need Colleen Sullivan's interpretation of behind the citygate production. Back in January, Noel Bartlo told me these deals stayed with CES Retail. John Singer believes the deals stay with him at Enron. If these deals stay with Enron, should they be at EES... since they are behind the citygate or do they stay with Enron to reduce the TCO delivery to the citygates for CES? This could be a can of worms. Colleen, what is the contract interruption? Does the citygate production deals stay with Enron? If they stay with Enron, then does CES realize this? Are the producers receiving two payments, one from Enron and one from CES. Maybe this has already be discussed and decided, but I haven't heard the official word. Currently these citygate production deals are deducted from the citygate delivery that CES needs. The numbers that Herndon LDC schedulers provide to Enron are reduced by the production. I think Chris put these buy/sells in the system to appease John and keep the Enron accounting system whole. Currently the market demand tickets in Sitara are reduced by the citygate supply. The pathing could be made easier by hooking up the citygate production supply to the market demand tickets, but the market demand numbers need to be increased. Then you could eliminate the buy/sell tickets that Chris Germany has been creating. However if this production gas is not Enron's, then Enron is creating a lot of unnecessary work and the producers are probably receiving two payments. From: Katherine L Kelly @ ECT 03/13/2000 10:34 AM To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas Hey guys, I wanted ya'll to see the below messages as well since these are TCO deals. I'm little confused now, because Wade had informed me that these were all deals behind the citygate that John Singer had been doing and that CES retail was pulling gas directly from these points. We found a few like this on CNG last week. The way we have been handling this is to show a buy from whomever at the citygate and hook it up as a buy/sell with CES retail. Chris has been setting up the tickets for the sell to CES retail, but right now he's priorities are just a bit different. I guess why I'm a little confused on these is that when I pulled up the Phoenix Dominion it has the pool attached to the deal and not one of the CPA's. Wade - Do you know whether deal 142669 is pool or a citygate deal? If it's pool, I don't know how we could have missed this all month because we would have had to nominate it in Navigator. Joanie - Do you have any insight into this? ---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 10:14 AM --------------------------- From: Katherine L Kelly 03/13/2000 09:58 AM To: Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas I'm sorry Wade, but there definitely seems to be a problem with manpower around here. Chris is in charge of handling all of the CES retail, so he needs to set up the corresponding sales and price them. My hands are kind of tied on the pathing until he is able to complete his end. Also, I will try to follow up on these, but since these are TCO points, please feel free to send further TCO issues to Robert Allwein. I have only been so heavily involved in the CNG because Molly LaFuze has been out on vacation. ---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:52 AM --------------------------- Chris Germany 03/13/2000 09:49 AM To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas Sorry guys. I'm still working on the February invoice to CES. I estimate that everyday this invoice does not get out cost Enron about $4,000 a day. Feel free to call my boss Scott Neal about the problems you are having. ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:46 AM --------------------------- Wade R Price 03/13/2000 09:33 AM To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: CES Pool Gas John Singer told me these two producers' deals expired 12/31/99. We will not need these set up. Producer Pipe Status Burkland, Richard CPA Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up Burkland, WIlliam S CPA Deal expired 12/31/99 No need to set up What is the status on these producers ? I have invoices and I need to pay these ASAP, especially Questa (they are calling). Questa Petroleum CPA Deal 213088 set up with meter number per 9911 pay statement. Production statement for volumes received from John Singer 3/8/00 Phoenix Dominion CPA/Cipco Deal 142669 Producer invoice available for information T & F Operating PennFuel Invoice in. Deal not set up. Not able to identify which Penn Fuel (56 or 56W) on CGAS