Message-ID: <10803496.1075853671165.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 05:52:00 -0800 (PST) From: victor.lamadrid@enron.com To: katherine.kelly@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com Subject: Re: New Power Company on Transco Cc: donna.greif@enron.com, clarissa.garcia@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com, beverly.beaty@enron.com, sherry.anastas@enron.com, tracy.wood@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: donna.greif@enron.com, clarissa.garcia@enron.com, robert.allwein@enron.com, beverly.beaty@enron.com, sherry.anastas@enron.com, tracy.wood@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com X-From: Victor Lamadrid X-To: Katherine L Kelly, Scott Goodell X-cc: Donna Greif, Clarissa Garcia, Robert Allwein, Beverly Beaty, Sherry Anastas, Tracy Wood, Chris Germany X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf Kathy/Scott, I don't know exactly what Chris wanted but here's my stab at it and remember my limited mental abilities are making a bunch of assumptions..... Deal 459233 is the exchange offset to 459214 and should probably be zerod out. 459193 is the exchange offset to 459175 and should probably be zerod out as well. Scott, 459188 and 459231 seem to be the New Power buys needed. I don't know which are the New Power sales needed to hook up with transport to capture transportation costs. Please verify...Maybe they are 377254 or 377264 or 377268 or 454060..... 460591 is the exchange offset to Oglethorpe deal 460623. They are totally different and legite and outside of this discussion. I hope this helps. Let's meet and make appropriate changes quickly so Transco folks will have plenty of time to get changes in Unify for the month. Thanks From: Katherine L Kelly 11/10/2000 05:06 PM To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: New Power Company on Transco Hello! Can we try to get together sometime Tuesday afternoon to discuss the New Power Company on Transco? Chris Germany mentioned to me this afternoon that there was a New Power Company deal starting with November production on Transco and that it was similar to the one on Columbia Gas in that the sale occurs at the storage facility. So, I decided to take a look and I can't swear to everything, but I believe we may need to make a few changes. Deals 459214 and 459175 appear to be beginning balances that have been entered as exchanges. I believe that these need to be killed. As far as I know, I don't believe that there is any reason for logistics to need for a beginning balance to come into unify. Beginning balances are entered into unify manually by my group through a special screen. We just need to know what that balance is before the December accounting month is closed so that we can upload it. Next, could you please get back to me with what the exchange deals of 459193 and 460623 are? I'm not quite sure what these exchanges were trying to accomplish. What I was thinking that I would see is something similar to how we have this on Columbia Gas. Perhaps Robert can help us on this. I believe that is a transport contract moving to a title transfer (external pool), then a storage injection on the storage contract into the storage imbalance account, then using the point functionality to show a buy/sell at storage to the New Power Company. Anyway, let me know when you are available. If we need to make adjustments, it would be best to get this done soon. Thanks! Kathy