Message-ID: <26700373.1075840489434.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 15:46:31 -0800 (PST) From: ed.mcmichael@enron.com To: louis.dicarlo@enron.com, michael.bridges@enron.com, ruth.concannon@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, robin.barbe@enron.com Subject: FW: Form of Presentation to the BTRC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: McMichael Jr., Ed X-To: Dicarlo, Louis , Bridges, Michael , Concannon, Ruth , Germany, Chris , Barbe, Robin X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Germany, Chris\Bankrupt X-Origin: GERMANY-C X-FileName: chris germany 6-25-02.pst FYI -----Original Message----- From: =09Zisman, Stuart =20 Sent:=09Monday, April 01, 2002 2:48 PM To:=09Schneider, Chip Cc:=09Semple, Robert; Bartlett, Jeff; Melendrez, Jesus; McMichael Jr., Ed; = Racicot, Paul; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Sewell, Doug Subject:=09Form of Presentation to the BTRC Chip, As you are aware, I met with Bob Semple this morning regarding the presenta= tions being made before the BTRC. Bob is of the view that these presentati= ons are often too long and detailed for the entire BTRC audience and that t= he presentation style/format should be modified slightly. We agreed on the= following: (1) the old presentations (which were generally several pages = in length and contained more detailed information) should continue to be pr= epared, (2) an "executive summary" should be prepared (on a single page) as= a cover sheet to the "old style" presentation, (3) the executive summary s= hould be limited to the proposed transaction, associated economics and othe= r highly pertinent information (such as ownership, debtor vs. non-debtor, t= hird party liabilities, etc.) and (4) the actual presentation at the BTRC m= eeting should be limited to the items reflected on the executive summary an= d although the "old style" presentations should be distributed to BTRC part= icipants (under cover of the executive summary), the information contained = therein should not be discussed or referred to unless questions arise durin= g the BTRC meeting that justify doing so. If any of this is unclear (or if you have a principled objection to making = this change), please give me a call. Thanks Stuart