Message-ID: <11150249.1075853725700.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 07:15:00 -0700 (PDT) From: scott.goodell@enron.com To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com Subject: Re: Theoretical Storage Cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, chris.germany@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, chris.germany@enron.com X-From: Scott.Goodell@enron.com X-To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com X-cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Ces X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf Here are the theoretical storage volumes based on the schedule, not noms... MSQ schd Theoretical Balance (Embedded image moved to file: pic14354.pcx) jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/23/2000 01:27:23 PM To: " - *Kinney, Doug" , " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" , " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" cc: Subject: Theoretical Storage We need to reach an agreement on the theoretical storage as CES needs to transfer to NPC a specific volume and price for COH, and AGL ESS, WSS and Sonat. I had thought we had an understanding that CES would be billed, per Melissa's memo of 3/15 and conversations during June, the percentages times the current month's storage capacity. We may have confused you by sending FOM noms for storage injections that were different than that formula, and Doug has noticed the bills from ENA tend to represent the noms. How should this be resolved? Should we go on ENA billed volumes or by the formula? Let me know. My calculations per the formula would give us the following balances for 7/31/00... COH-4,053,906 AGL-Sonat- 504,379 AGL-ESS-9,827 AGL-WSS-220,209 - pic14354.pcx