Message-ID: <6485725.1075853756870.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 01:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com To: scott.goodell@enron.com Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Cc: chris.germany@enron.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: chris.germany@enron.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com X-From: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com X-To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" X-cc: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" , " - *Bizik, Kim" , " - *McCain, Scott" X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf Scott--The volumes delivered into Central Hudson off Iroquois for Arma Textiles was included in Exhibit 1 of the 12/99 Energy Purchase Agreement such that it would appear that Enron would be supplying this gas to CES. However, the gas to supply Arma was already purchased from Duke Energy, and as far as I can tell, Enron has had nothing to do with delivering this gas, and Duke Energy has billed us directly for the gas that they supply each month. I discussed this with Chris Germany, and we agreed that CES would just deal directly with Duke Energy on this and leave Enron out of it. Accordingly, if you look at the May'00 first-of-the-month request that I sent to Enron on April 24, the table does show 135 dth/day into Central Hudson off Iroquois. However, the table notes that this gas is being supplied by Duke Energy and therefore no volumes are being requested from Enron. Please let me know if this needs further action or clarification. Thanks. Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 04/28/2000 08:30:26 AM Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Doug - Per a conversation with Chris, he says this remained with CES. Can you comment? Scott ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron on 04/28/2000 07:24 AM --------------------------- smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/28/2000 05:31:46 AM To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles According to GMS, Doug purchased the gas. The period was from Feb'00 - May'00. The supplier was Duke. The contract was assigned to Enron. Scott Scott.Goodell@enron.com on 04/27/2000 06:31:31 PM Please respond to Scott.Goodell@enron.com To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles check with Donna or Doug. To my knowledge, ENA did not receive these deals. Scott smccain@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/26/2000 10:26:31 AM To: " - *scott.goodell@enron.com" cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Scott, Arma Textiles is served by Cental Hudson. Scott ---------------------- Forwarded by Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas on 04/26/2000 11:25 AM --------------------------- From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 09:40 AM To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Enron is probably not familiar with the deal as they did not have to make any nominations. Although, the deal was documented each month on the memos and spreadsheets that were sent to Enron. I do not have a contact at Duke. It was my understanding that both parties (Duke and Arma) knew the deal was a fixed quantity. Scott McCain 04/26/2000 09:34 AM To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Kim, I spoke to Enron concerning the Duke supply agreement. Thye weere not familiar with it. Do you have a contact @ Duke? Also, do you know if they agreement is a full requirements or fixed quantity? Thanks, Scott From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 09:06 AM To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles good question....gotta get back to ya Scott McCain 04/26/2000 08:28 AM To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles What hurts worse, you body or losing your favorite truck? Scott From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/26/2000 08:00 AM To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Just a few left and a torn intercoastal muscle. (kinda painful) Thanks for asking. Be careful out there with those big truckers. Scott McCain 04/26/2000 06:34 AM To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Subject: Re: Arma Textiles Thanks. How is the recovery process coming? Are the bumps & bruises gone? Scott From: Kim Novsek Bizik on 04/25/2000 04:23 PM To: Scott McCain/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Elden Condie/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Richard Contos/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas Subject: Re: Arma Textiles When I was assigned Central Hudson in January I was told that there was one customer behind the gate and that was Arma Textiles. Arma was backed 100% by a Duke purchase that subseqently went with the Enron sale. I was informed by the previous scheduler that all CES did was to make the nomination based on GMS at bidweek. It was a stand alone deal that CES nominated based on GMS. Scott McCain 04/25/2000 11:04 AM To: Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas cc: Elden Condie/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Richard Contos/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas Subject: Arma Textiles Kim, I am in the process of assigning this customer to a new marketer. A review of the file shows a recent correspondence concerning tariff gas purchased by Arma between Kurt Marburger & Charlie Dalphon. Are you able to shed any light on the issue? There is a significant outstanding balance and I believe the customer has made the decision to stop payment until credits are issued for the tariff charges. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Scott