Message-ID: <20023382.1075853760515.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 05:25:00 -0700 (PDT) From: colleen.sullivan@enron.com To: scott.neal@enron.com, hunter.shively@enron.com, phillip.allen@enron.com Subject: Transport P&L Report FYI Cc: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, theresa.branney@enron.com, kimberly.olinger@enron.com, jane.tholt@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, theresa.branney@enron.com, kimberly.olinger@enron.com, jane.tholt@enron.com X-From: Colleen Sullivan X-To: Scott Neal, Hunter S Shively, Phillip K Allen X-cc: Jeffrey A Shankman, Judy Townsend, Dan Junek, Chris Germany, Theresa Branney, Kimberly S Olinger, Jane M Tholt X-bcc: X-Folder: \Chris_Germany_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Germany-C X-FileName: cgerman.nsf Just for your information--this may highlight the reason for the difficulty for the East Region dividing its transportation usage tickets by contract number. For the entire month of May, the Central region's transport p&l report is 20 pages long (and that's after splitting up transport tickets by contract number); the West report is 34 pages long; and the East + Market East report is 90 pages long without splitting transport tickets by contract number. If the East began breaking up usage tickets by contract number, it could result in a five to seven fold increase in tickets. Any thoughts ?