Message-ID: <8181774.1075840540442.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:56:05 -0800 (PST)
From: dpmckinney@txu.com
To: set@ercot.com
Subject: Premise Type
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: dpmckinney@txu.com@ENRON
X-To: set@ercot.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Gilbert-smith, Doug\Deleted Items
X-Origin: GILBERTSMITH-D
X-FileName: doug gilbert smith 6-25-02.PST

fyi..
---------------------- Forwarded by Donald McKinney/USEG/TXU on 01/08/2002
09:53 AM ---------------------------


Donald McKinney
01/07/2002 10:27 AM

To:   dodle@ercot.com
cc:   Johnny Robertson/BIZSRV/TXU@TXUB, Darrell Hobbs/USEG/TXU@TXUU

Subject:  Premise Type

Dave,

Johnny and I had some folks do some checking and, they retracted their
first statement about the premise type being in production.  It is not
being sent right now.

Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by Donald McKinney/USEG/TXU on 01/07/2002
10:24 AM ---------------------------


Paul Morrison
01/07/2002 09:53 AM

To:   Donald McKinney/USEG/TXU@TXUU, Johnny Robertson/BIZSRV/TXU@TXUB
cc:   Jill Prince/USEG/TXU@TXUU

Subject:  Premise Type

Johnny/Paul, I followed up with IT to determine how quickly we could get
the Premise Type removed from the 814_04 and found out that Registration is
not sending the field on the 814_04.

CR #1176, which added the Premise Type to the 814_04 for Texas SET v1.4,
shows a status of complete.  However, the CR is not complete as
Registration is unable to send the field on the 814_04 until the 814_04
implementation guide is complete.

In short, we should not have to make any changes to remove functionality.
Let me know if you have any questions.

Paul