Message-ID: <21134387.1075840545889.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:45:06 -0800 (PST) From: d..steffes@enron.com To: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com Subject: FW: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Steffes, James D. X-To: Gilbert-smith, Doug X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Gilbert-smith, Doug\Inbox X-Origin: GILBERTSMITH-D X-FileName: doug gilbert smith 6-25-02.PST Doug -- Please do not send anything out to the PUC until my team has reviewed. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Presto, Kevin M. Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:42 PM To: Steffes, James D.; Gilbert-smith, Doug Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs OK - Doug can have Smith Day and Jeff Miller work to get the retail certification. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:11 PM To: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs We need to have everything in 30 days. I know that. The question is given everything else - FERC MBR, gas pipelines, PJM, etc. - isn't it better to move into ERCOT at the wholesale level and then come back after getting the rest of the market moving along? From a resource standpoint, I need to understand how to get PUCT counsel for UBS to start the REP process anyway. JIm -----Original Message----- From: Presto, Kevin M. Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:47 PM To: Steffes, James D.; Gilbert-smith, Doug Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs We need it w/in the first 30 days. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:33 AM To: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug Subject: Re: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs But do we need it immediately? Can we file later for retail authority? -------------------------- Jim Steffes Enron