Message-ID: <4755677.1075855599581.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:28:00 -0800 (PST)
From: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To: anne.bike@enron.com, jennifer.bagwell@enron.com, monique.sanchez@enron.com
Subject: PG&E Citygate Basis position for January
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mike Grigsby
X-To: Anne Bike, Jennifer Bagwell, Monique Sanchez
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Michael_Grigsby_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Grigsby-M
X-FileName: mgrigsb.nsf

Okay, I think the tds tab in newcurrentday was wrong.  It is showing a jan 
pos of 269.55 lots, but TDS is showing 539.1.  False alarm.  We will fix 
newcurrentday.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 10:19 
PM ---------------------------


Mike Grigsby
11/29/2000 10:21 PM
To: Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Monique 
Sanchez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: PG&E Citygate Basis position for January

The PG&E basis position in TDS does not match the FEB/MAR position.  The Baja 
spread was executed as a NOV-MAR position months ago. The only real changes 
were to Socal basis over time. There is no telling when this might have 
changed in error.  Will you please research the position to see when this 
position was reduced.  I am guessing that a park and loan was executed by 
Frank Ermis at some point and the basis risk was allocated to GD New by 
mistake.  

Thanks,
Mike