Message-ID: <7533952.1075840613427.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:20:00 -0800 (PST) From: monika.causholli@enron.com To: portland.shift@enron.com, cara.semperger@enron.com, stacy.runswick@enron.com, lisa.gang@enron.com Subject: EPE preschedules notification Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Monika Causholli X-To: Portland Shift, Cara Semperger, Stacy Runswick, Lisa Gang X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \mark guzman 6-28-02\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: GUZMAN-M X-FileName: mark guzman 6-28-02.nsf Guys, I had quite a bitter experience on Saturday with EPE schedules and I am sharing it with you so that you know what to do if it happens to you. The dispatchers called saying that SRP was not checking out and that EPE was supposed to send to SRP 100 MW on a prescheduled basis. I had SRP fax me the tags and in the meantime I cut some of my econ sales to allow some room for this 100Mw to SRP. The tags looked accurate except for one little detail that I missed which made all the difference. This schedule was actually a generation exchange between EPE and TEP where TEP was sending these MWs to SRP. To be able to tell this tag from a regular one look at the column titled Ref which says GF-EX which means gen exch. If you come across a tag that says GF-EX DO NOT accept the tag. Be sure first before you go in and cut you econ sales. This has happened a couple of times lately and hopefully this will help. If this is not clear to you let me know and I will explain it further, Thanks, Monika