Message-ID: <30971606.1075840630259.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:19:00 -0800 (PST) From: d.hunsucker@enron.com To: portland.shift@enron.com, lester.rawson@enron.com, phillip.platter@enron.com, chris.mallory@enron.com, carla.hoffman@enron.com Subject: Deal Entry Reminder Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: D Brett Hunsucker X-To: Portland Shift, Lester Rawson, Phillip Platter, Chris Mallory, Carla Hoffman X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \mark guzman 6-28-02\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: GUZMAN-M X-FileName: mark guzman 6-28-02.nsf All The group has been doing a great job with deal entry - with a few exceptions. I just want to go over a some basics: Make sure your price index is appropriate for the delivery point. If you enter a delivery point of Malin, Capt Jack, or COB, your price index should reference NW1, not NW3, NW2, etc. If it's a Day-Of (Hour-Ahead) deal, make sure the price index reflects that, i.e., it has the "HA" in the index. If the deal is such that the PX is doing the import/export for us (title to the power changes hands at a tie point, versus in a load zone such as NP, SP or ZP), the counterparty should be California Power Exchange - Scheduling Coordinator (CalPX-SC). This lets people know EPMI is not the importer/exporter of the power - the PX is responsible for that. If you buy/sell from/to the PX @ NP, SP or ZP, the counterparty is simply California Power Exchange (CalPX). If the deal is due to a real-time cut, the counterparty is California PX - Time Removal. The price should an ISO-based index and it should always be either ISOHANP15inc/dec, or ISOHASP15inc/dec. Currently there are some messages (in Deal Entry and Deal Blotter) tied to the Time-Removal counterparty that indicate the price should be either ISOHANP15 or ISOSP15 (without the Inc/Dec ). For now, ignore that message and make sure the index included Inc/Dec. When IT releases a new version of Deal Entry and Deal Blotter, we'll be able to better manage these "checks". Also, even though the index should be based on the ISO for these types of deals, the delivery point should still be the actual delivery point, such as PV, 4C, etc. It's important these deals are entered correctly. If they're not, the P/L that is reported to mgt is incorrect - and it will be until I come thru to settle. Thanks. Brett