Message-ID: <1298038.1075845019859.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:51:00 -0800 (PST) From: janette.elbertson@enron.com To: dan.fournier@blakes.com Subject: Re: Blake, Cassels & Graydon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Janette Elbertson X-To: "DAN FOURNIER" @ENRON X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf Mr. Fournier: This is Janette Elbertson, Mark Haedicke's Assistant. I spoke with your assistant this morning and this meeting has been rescheduled for Thursday, March 1, at 11:30 am in Jim Derrick's office. Lunch is scheduled after the meeting if that meets your schedule. Mark Haedicke is traveling this week. I will call your e-mail to his attention upon his return on Friday. "DAN FOURNIER" 02/09/2001 09:42 AM To: cc: Subject: Blake, Cassels & Graydon Dear Mark: I trust you had a pleasant holiday season. I understand that our meeting with Jim Derrick and you has been rescheduled to the first part of March. Your assistant gave us the choice of March 1 or 2. Although we can accommodate both dates, March 1 works better for David Jackson. Our understanding is that Blakes is not getting any further work from Enron as a result of the circumstances under which we could no longer continue acting for Enron in litigation involving Westcoast, another Blakes client. As you can well imagine, the prospect of losing our valued relationship with Enron is extremely disappointing, especially considering the significant inroads we had made during the last couple of years in getting to know Enron, its various businesses and representing your interests on a number of major transactions and initiatives in Canada. At this point in time, we need to better understand where we stand and whether there is any prospect of representing your interests in Canada. One of our concerns in trying to mend fences is our relationship with your Calgary office which we perceive to be paramount in any effort to re-establish the kind of relationship we had with Enron prior to this incident. As a result, we would like to seek your views on this prior to our meeting in Houston so as not to further aggravate our relationship with the Calgary office. David Jackson and Jim Christie, two key members of our senior executive, and I would be available to discuss this matter with you at your convenience Wednesday, Thursday or Friday of next week. Perhaps you can let me know what works best for you and we could initiate the call. Thanking you in advance for your kind consideration. Best regards, Dan