Message-ID: <5653266.1075859846426.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 06:42:00 -0800 (PST)
From: alan.aronowitz@enron.com
To: mark.haedicke@enron.com
Subject: Re: performance review
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Alan Aronowitz
X-To: Mark E Haedicke
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: Haedicke-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

I don't really have any datapoints for most of 2000 for Dan.

I guess I could see what Rick has said in the written form and sit in on the 
review so that we can make sure there is no confused message.

Any other suggestions in this awkward situation?

Alan



	Mark E Haedicke
	03/09/2001 01:26 PM
		 
		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: performance review

Shouldn't you and Rick do that together so as not to have confusion.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 01:25 PM -----

	Rick Bergsieker@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	03/09/2001 05:42 AM
		 
		 To: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Dave Hill/Enron@EnronXGate, Brenda J 
Johnston/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark E Haedicke@ECT
		 Subject: performance review

I have completed your written performance review and have put a signed 
original copy in the mail to you.  When you get it, contact Brenda to arrange 
for a time for us to talk.  After we talk, you will have to sign the original 
and forward it to Dave Hill.