Message-ID: <29486408.1075859682669.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:22:00 -0800 (PST) From: janice.moore@enron.com To: peter.keohane@enron.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com Subject: NGX Cc: janette.elbertson@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: janette.elbertson@enron.com X-From: Janice R Moore X-To: Peter Keohane, Mark E Haedicke X-cc: Janette Elbertson X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Dec2000_1\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: Haedicke-M X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf Talked to Bill McCoy at Morgan, Stanley about the Richard Shelton affidavit. He was aware of the efforts made last week, but not directly involved, b/c he was out of the country. Now that he's back, he said he would check into it further, but he's doubtful that Morgan will be able to take a public position on this. Although the commodities group is definitely in favor of it, there might well be other constituents of the Morgan Stanley/Dean Witter family of companies for whom such a position could be "too confining" in other circumstances when those other companies/groups might wish to take an opposite position. He said he would look again at trying to get clearance, but he's not really hopeful. He asked me whether Rich Shelton would have to actually testify, and I repeated what our counsel told us that cross-examination is likely but does not have to occur in Calgary. He asked about our timetable and said he will call me back either way and will try to expedite it. I'll keep you posted. Regards, Janice EB3861 Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp. 713-853-1794 (Fax: 713-646-4842)