Message-ID: <18413699.1075845064994.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 11:17:00 -0700 (PDT) From: mark.haedicke@enron.com To: vicki.sharp@enron.com Subject: Re: Conflict question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mark E Haedicke X-To: Vicki Sharp X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf No problem with the no litigation exception. Mark Vicki Sharp@EES 05/09/2001 05:07 PM To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Conflict question please let me know asap if you have a problem with our waiving the conflict below. Thanks. ---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 05/09/2001 05:02 PM --------------------------- Marty Keyser 05/09/2001 12:05 PM To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Conflict question Vicki: Have you received a response from Mark? If not, I would be pleased to follow up directly with Mark if you wish. I have received a second request from Reed Smith regarding our position on the potential conflict. Thanks, Marty Enron Energy Services From: Vicki Sharp 04/30/2001 12:30 PM Phone No: 713 853-7413 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Marty Keyser/EFS/EES@EES Subject: Conflict question This is a Pittsburgh firm we use from time to time, primarily for EFS and litigation matters. It seems that we should waive these conflicts. Please let me know if you agree or if you need more detail. ---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 04/30/2001 12:29 PM --------------------------- Marty Keyser 04/30/2001 07:51 AM To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Conflict question Vicki: Attached is a memo from Reed Smith, our local counsel in Pittsburgh, regarding two (2) potential conflict situations. Please let me know how you would like me to proceed. Thanks, Marty ---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Keyser/EFS/EES on 04/30/2001 07:40 AM --------------------------- "Vitsas, John L." on 04/27/2001 06:28:31 AM To: Marty Keyser/EFS/EES@EES cc: Subject: Conflict question Per our discussion yesterday Marty I've been asked to check on two issues regarding Enron. First an attorney in our Philadelphia office has been asked to do some work for Wiser Oil Company as follows. Wiser is acquiring the stock of a Canadian Corporation called Invasion Energy. Enron Canada owns about 50% of the stock of Invasion. Wiser has Canadian counsel who has asked us to work with them. Enron Canada is represented by Bennett Jones LLP. Although we don't do any work for Enron Canada, I thought I needed to see if anyone at Enron had any problems with Reed Smith getting involved in this transaction as stated above. I'm told an answer to this one ASAP would be nice. Second question is a little more confusing. An attorney in our New York office has been asked by a broker for Enron Global Services to get involved in negotiating a financial guarantee insurance agreement about providing insurance coverage for Winterthur International. We would be representing Winterthur in the transaction. I can get more information if needed. Thanks for checking on these Marty. Let me know