Message-ID: <20175128.1075860369760.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:42:00 -0800 (PST) From: mary.hain@enron.com To: james.steffes@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, ramon.alvarez@enron.com Subject: Re: Bankruptcy Notification to FERC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mary Hain X-To: Joe Hartsoe@Enron, James D Steffes, Susan J Mara, Alan Comnes, Sarah Novosel, Ramon Alvarez@CCMAIL, Ramon Alvarez X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Hain-M X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 08:49 AM --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: "Howard Shapiro" 03/13/2001 08:27 AM To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , "Cheryl Feik Ryan" , "Gary Bachman" , "Julie Richardson" cc: Subject: Re: Bankruptcy Notification to FERC Because Avista is on Pacific Standard Time, it can't consider and respond to your invitation for comments by noon EST. We will get back to you as soon as we can. Our question is whether the proposed notice of bankruptcy should categorically concede that FERC's charge back proceeding and all other pending FERC proceedings against the CalPX are automatically stayed? Or should we leave room for the PX and the charge back complainants to work out an agreement that the charge back case does not involve the PX's assets, and thus is not subject to the stay? We are seeking input from Avista's bankruptcy counsel. Howard E. Shapiro (202) 298-1884 hes@vnf.com >>> "Andrea Settanni" 03/13/01 10:49AM >>> Attached is the letter that we intend to file at FERC today regarding the bankruptcy petition. Please let us know by noon today if you have any comments.