Message-ID: <28511614.1075860372722.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:44:00 -0800 (PST) From: pljacklin@stoel.com To: mhain@ect.enron.com Subject: Re:Proposed Errata Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Pamela Jacklin" X-To: mhain@ect.enron.com X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Hain-M X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf Jon Wright (and service list) At clarification we discussed a possible errata to clarify the last line of BPA 68 page 2 Section F.1. A. The sentence reads: "The LB CRAC does apply to Slice purchases and the 1,000 aMW power sale portion of the REP Settlement, including where power sales are converted to financial benefits under the Settlement." the proposed correction is revise the final phrase of the sentence to read: "..., including where such power sales are converted cash payments calculated pursuant to Section %(b) of the REP Settlement Agreement." Section 5(b) references conversion of power sales to cash at the mid-C index under certain situations. This is the circumstance when the delta should be calculated off the "CRAC'd" RL rate. The language change would make clear that the LB CRAC does not apply to a company that chooses to convert a firm power sale to all Monetary benefits under Section 4(1)(b) of the REP Settlement Agreement. In that event, the share of the 1000 MW of power turned down by the IOU taking all financial benefits is reallocated to the other IOUs in the same jurisdiction and the companies receiving the power pay the LB CRAC for that power. The Company taking financial benefits receives benefits calculated using the 38 mills. Jon-- after you have had an opportunity to review this proposed errata and the Settlement Agreement, please let me know whether BPA will file an errata. Others: If you have questions, please feel free to call or email Scott Brattebo or me.