Message-ID: <7475855.1075860386917.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:58:00 -0800 (PST) From: mary.hain@enron.com To: christian.yoder@enron.com, steve.c.hall@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, james.keller@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, dennis.benevides@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, robert.badeer@enron.com, jeff.richter@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, roger.yang@enron.com, chris.foster@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com Subject: Confidential Attorney Client Privilege - Attorney Work Product Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mary Hain X-To: Christian Yoder, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders, James D Steffes, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel, James E Keller, Mike D Smith, Harry Kingerski, Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden, Robert Badeer, Jeff Richter, gfergus@brobeck.com, Alan Comnes, Richard Shapiro, Roger Yang, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Chris H Foster, Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Hain-M X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf I have drafted the attached letter denying the Cal ISO's request to send it (and the EOB) EPMI and EES' cost information for transactions over the FERC's cost cap. Since I believe we are on very firm ground, my initial inclination was to send no response to the ISO's letter, so there would be nothing to quote in the press. However, I drafted this letter at Alan's suggestion for purposes of discussion. We should decide whether to send a letter before distributing this draft more widely in-house to discuss how to parse the message.