Message-ID: <29876784.1075860392684.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 06:11:00 -0800 (PST) From: christi.nicolay@enron.com To: mary.hain@enron.com Subject: Re: Draft interconnection procedure Cc: james.steffes@enron.com, jay_dudley@pgn.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: james.steffes@enron.com, jay_dudley@pgn.com X-From: Christi L Nicolay X-To: Mary Hain X-cc: James D Steffes, Jay_dudley@pgn.com X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Hain-M X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf Comments: 2.3 Delete last sentence. If Enron is already in the queue (or considered in a queue) before a TP's interconnection procedures are filed at FERC, we don't want to have to resubmit something within 15 days in order to remain in the queue. I don't think this is necessary and all are protected because pre-existing requests will be posted on OASIS on the queue. 4.3 Enron has argued for 60 days consistent with the OATT times (lost unfortunately). It may look odd for PGE to ask for 90 days. PGE is protected because if it legitimately takes longer than 60 days, you send a notification. 6 ((I realize that this language was included in CP&L, but recommend these changes for PGE.) 6.1 Add after "as modified by the Commission" "if Customer chooses to commence construction." 6.2 Modify last sentence -- The Agreement will provide milestones toward placing the generator in service that the Interconnection Customer must make reasonable progress toward or it will lose its queue priority (after notification and opportunity to remedy.) Thanks. Mary Hain 03/13/2001 12:10 PM To: Christi Nicolay cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jay_dudley@pgn.com Subject: Draft interconnection procedure Since EPMI doesn't have any PGE interconnection requests pending, Jay Dudley agreed to allow us to review PGE's draft FERC interconnection filing. As I mentioned to you on Friday, PGE is trying to file this week so we have a quick turn around time. I'm going to try to read it today. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 10:09 AM --------------------------- From: JAY DUDLEY/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/12/2001 07:39 PM CST To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Frank Afranji/ENRON@enronxgate, MICHELE FARRELL/ENRON@enronxgate Subject: Draft interconnection procedure Mary - here is a draft of what the PGE interconnection procedure will be. As I said, much of this is from VEPCO and Carolina Power. Michele is redrafting it to be compatible with our OATT. Let me know your comments as we want to file with FERC this week. Thanks. Jay.