Message-ID: <8313751.1075860383515.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT) From: mary.hain@enron.com To: paul.kaufman@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com, sean.crandall@enron.com Subject: Issues for RRG Meeting Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Mary Hain X-To: paul kaufman, steve walton, sean crandall X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Mary_Hain_Aug2000_Jul2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Hain-M X-FileName: mary-hain.nsf Paul-welcome back. I have taken the following positions that may (or may= =20 not) come up at the RRG meeting. Even if the issues don't come up, I wanted= =20 to give you an update: =01=07 The security coordinator (SC) should be part of the RTO. In the N= W, the =20 SC contracts with the utilities. The proposal is to have the RTO contract= =20 with the SC . In the East, Tabors studied SCs and found they allowed the=20 transmission owners (TO) to discriminate. However, there, the SC is employe= d=20 by the TO. I need to know more about how the NW SC contract is structured a= nd=20 talk to Tabors before I would feel comfortable giving up on this issue. Do= =20 others have opinions on this? =01=07 I support moving the load integration agreement (LIA) and generation= =20 integration agreement (GIA) into the tariff. I am developing momentum for= =20 this. =01=07 Concerning governance, I drafted a paper opposing state agencies vot= ing for=20 board members. I also oppose a member class for a catchall member class. = I=20 would also oppose a class for the state commissions if they are given the= =20 right tovote for directors.