Message-ID: <5255128.1075844293924.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 03:34:00 -0800 (PST) From: lisa.lunz@enron.com To: rod.hayslett@enron.com, danette.campbell@enron.com Subject: Re: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Cc: karry.kendall@enron.com, karen.gruesen@enron.com, jane.coleman@enron.com, jim.coffey@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: karry.kendall@enron.com, karen.gruesen@enron.com, jane.coleman@enron.com, jim.coffey@enron.com X-From: Lisa Lunz X-To: Rod Hayslett, Danette Campbell X-cc: Karry Kendall, Karen Gruesen, Jane Coleman, Jim Coffey X-bcc: X-Folder: \Rodney_Hayslett_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: HAYSLETT-R X-FileName: rhaysle.nsf Please read below regarding Jane Coleman and her FERC Request. Contact Karen Gruesen @ 3-6571 for further information as to why Jane needs this role. Thanks Lisa Lunz 3-5634 ---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lunz/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 11:28 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Karen Gruesen @ ECT 11/06/2000 11:01 AM To: Lisa Lunz/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Jane DOES need the FERC role. She will be running the assessments for the FAR orders during the close process. Co. 930 is a regulated entity and Jane will be accounting for it. She will need access to the FERC account information in order to create the Rail Road Commission Report at year end. Please let me know who we need to direct this to and I will discuss it with them further. Thanks, Karen Lisa Lunz@ENRON 11/06/2000 10:52 AM To: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Karry/Karen Jane has been denied a role below. Is this acceptable? Please advise. Lisa ---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lunz/Corp/Enron on 11/06/2000 10:46 AM --------------------------- From: SAP Security 11/06/2000 10:14 AM Sent by: Danette Campbell To: Jane Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Lisa Lunz/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Jane, You have been approved for the TR CASH VIEW role, instead of the TR View role as was requested, per Mary Perkins. This will be effective the next time you logon to SAP. Please call the SAP Hotline at 713-345-4727 if you have any questions. The FERC roles that you requested have been denied. If you do need these roles, please send us a detailed business explation so we will be able to send it to the approver with your request. Thank you! Danette Rod Hayslett 11/06/2000 06:46 AM To: SAP Security@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Denied. No reason given for access to FERC data. From: SAP Security 11/03/2000 05:10 PM Sent by: Danette Campbell To: Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON cc: Karen Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Lunz/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Jane Coleman, case 262558. Per Lisa Lunz, Jane Coleman is an ENA employee requesting access to the following roles, and they are pending your approval. Please email your response to SAP Security. If you have any questions, please let us know. Jane currently has access to the FI CONSOLIDATED Viewer role only. A business reason is in the attached Security Request Form below. Pending approval from Mary Perkins: TR VIEW Pending approval from Jim Coffey: PS VIEW FN AM MAINTAIN & REPORT NON-FIXED ASSET DATA Pending approval from Mark Frank: EC CONSOLIDATION VIEW - LEGAL EC CONSOLIDATION VIEW - TEAM REPORTING FN CO ANAYLST FN CO INTERNAL ORDER ANALYST FN CO CCA PLANNER FN CO PCA PLANNER FN CO MASTER DATA CREATOR FN GL JOURNAL ENTRY ACCOUNTANT Pending approval from Georgeanne Hodges: AR VIEW AR CASH APPLIER Pending approval from Rod Hayslet: FERC DATA VIEW FERC ACCOUNTANT Lisa Lunz 11/02/2000 10:35 AM To: SAP Security@ENRON cc: Karen Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: Request - SAP Roles for Jane Coleman Please disregard the first request. This is the correct one.