Message-ID: <14521944.1075854916998.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 14:28:48 -0700 (PDT) From: marie.heard@enron.com To: hudsonr@teai.com Subject: RE: Fee Letter Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Heard, Marie X-To: '"Hudson, Roeline" @ENRON' X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MHEARD (Non-Privileged)\Heard, Marie\Sent Items X-Origin: Heard-M X-FileName: MHEARD (Non-Privileged).pst This is an easy one. 1400 Smith, EB3803B. Thanks! Marie -----Original Message----- From: "Hudson, Roeline" @ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:28 PM To: Heard, Marie Subject: RE: Fee Letter Hi - You didn't think you would away today without another e-mail from me, did you???? (just joking) When I courier these documents over to you tomorrow I will send them to 1400 Smith Street, but don't I have to put in a building number or room number for you in order that it will get to you for sure? Let me know what that is - Thanks, Until tomorrow, Roeline > -----Original Message----- > From: Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:28 PM > To: HudsonR@teai.com > Subject: RE: Fee Letter > > Hi, Roeline: > > We would prefer to sign the fee letter at the same time we sign the > assignments. Yes, we will sign enough originals of all documents so that > all parties can have an original. > > Hopefully we can get this wrapped up tomorrow, as I will be out of the > office Friday. > > Marie > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Hudson, Roeline" @ENRON > > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+ > 40ENRON@ENRON.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:26 PM > To: Heard, Marie > Subject: RE: Fee Letter > > Marie - > > One more question - I received some of these in duplicate, and some of > them > were original only. Like the Termination Agreement that you just > couriered > over to me - I only got one original from you, and there are two > signatures. > We would like to have an original signature as well - so are we going > to > do > this after the fact? That would be okay by me, because I want to have > them > all signed and off my desk - so just let me know how you think we > should > do > this. > > Thanks, Marie - > Roeline > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marie.Heard@enron.com [SMTP:Marie.Heard@enron.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:32 PM > > To: HudsonR@teai.com > > Cc: Russell.Diamond@enron.com > > Subject: RE: Fee Letter > > > > Hi, Roeline! > > > > I'm sending the original revised Termination Agreement over to you > this > > afternoon. Let me know if you have any questions or need anything > else. > > > > Marie > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Hudson, Roeline" @ENRON > > > > > > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Hudson+2C+20Roeline+22+20+3CHudsonR+40teai+2Ecom+3E+ > > 40ENRON@ENRON.com] > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:52 AM > > To: Heard, Marie > > Subject: RE: Fee Letter > > > > Hi Marie, > > > > The fee letter looks good - and I have all of the paperwork here, > > except > > of > > course the Termination letter for ENA Deal #0619, which you > indicated > > the > > Confirmation Desk was workin on. So things look good to go. > > > > I have the paperwork back from both Dynegy and Sempra, but United > Oil's > > letters is being reviewed by its lawyer today. He was away for > the > > past > > two > > days. As soon as I have everything together I will courier the > > complete > > package to you - one detail that I forgot to mention - right now I > have > > fax > > copies only, and I hope it will suffice until I can get original > > signatures. > > If it does not, then we are in real trouble!! So say it is okay - > and > > I > > will work on the originals after the deal is completed. > > > > Thanks for all your help, Marie. > > > > Roeline > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Heard, Marie [SMTP:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:51 AM > > > To: hudsonr@teai.com > > > Cc: Diamond, Russell > > > Subject: Fee Letter > > > > > > Hi, Roeline! > > > > > > Attached for your review is a draft of the proposed fee letter > in > > > connection with the assignments and terminations. Please let me > know > > if > > > you have any comments. > > > > > > Our Confirmation Desk is in the process of revising the > termination > > of > > > ENA Deal No. NL0619.1 to delete the fee reference, and I will > forward > > it > > > to you when ready. > > > > > > Please let me know when you have signoff on the other documents > and I > > > will finalize and have executed by ENA and forward to you. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Marie > > > > > > > > > <<060ltr (torch).doc>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant > > affiliate > > > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the > sole > use > > of > > > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or > > disclosure by > > > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient > > (or > > > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the > sender > > or > > > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com > and > > > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any > attachments > > hereto) > > > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not > create > > or > > > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. > (or > > any of > > > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, > and > > may > > not > > > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or > > > otherwise. Thank you. > > > > > > ********************************************************************** > > << > > > File: 060ltr (torch).doc >>