Message-ID: <31872089.1075854922135.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:02:44 -0700 (PDT) From: marie.heard@enron.com To: samantha.boyd@enron.com Subject: FW: Lotus Notes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Heard, Marie X-To: Boyd, Samantha X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MHEARD (Non-Privileged)\Heard, Marie\Sent Items X-Origin: Heard-M X-FileName: MHEARD (Non-Privileged).pst -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Tana Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:50 PM To: Cook, Mary; Gray, Barbara N.; Greenberg, Mark; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Bailey, Susan; Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie Subject: Lotus Notes I just got a call from Rob Wheeler, one of our power dealmakers, quizzing me about 15 counterparties he was interested in the status of the masters/guaranties our group is working on. What I found out was in situations where we are reviewing counterparty guaranties unassociated with a master or an confirmation, there is no record in Lotus Notes to tell us who is working on the guaranty so I was unable to tell him whether we had it, who was working on it or what the status was. It didn't made us look very good. I would suggest that in the future that we open an entry in Lotus Notes when we are reviewing counterparty incoming guaranties so we have a record of them. As a note, the three guaranties Rob is VERY interested in are: NYSEG Solutions (already being worked on in Legal per Credit), Energetix and Keyspan Corp. (Credit is not sure). Thanks for your kind consideration!