Message-ID: <15833929.1075844948419.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 06:43:00 -0800 (PST) From: michael.burke@enron.com To: stanley.horton@enron.com Subject: Re: Steve Todoroff--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Michael Burke X-To: Stanley Horton X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Stanley_Horton_1\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: HORTON-S X-FileName: shorton.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Burke/Houston/Eott on 03/16/2000 02:50 PM --------------------------- Steve Duffy 03/16/2000 01:53 PM To: Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott cc: Subject: Re: Steve Todoroff--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE fyi ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott on 03/16/2000 01:51 PM --------------------------- Steve Duffy 03/16/2000 01:51 PM To: Walt Zimmerman/Houston/Eott@Eott cc: jdegeeter@velaw.com, dharvin@velaw.com, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, wlawler@velaw.com, mtuohey@velaw.com Subject: Re: Steve Todoroff--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Thanks for the update, but Steve's position is pretty pathetic. If (when) the grand jury indicts him, he's going to have a pretty tough time with a defamation or libel suit. I think its a deluded puff. SWD WALT ZIMMERMAN 03/16/2000 01:00 PM To: jdegeeter@velaw.com, dharvin@velaw.com cc: Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, wlawler@velaw.com, mtuohey@velaw.com Subject: Steve Todoroff--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE I wanted you to be aware of something we learned today from one of our trading counterparties. Dana Gibbs spoke with an individual at Koch who has recently spoken with Todoroff. Apparently, Todoroff is in the job market. He has apparently indicated that he intends to sue EOTT for defamation as soon as EOTT links his name with the NGL theft. He also apparently told Koch that his attorneys are "ready to go with the lawsuit" as soon as EOTT links his name with the theft. Todoroff's "planned lawsuit" may just be some more yarn in this fabrication, but it emphasizes again the need to keep this matter as confidential as possible (at least until Todoroff is indicted). On a side note, Todoroff has certainly developed an interesting interview technique! Just imagine going in for a job interview and saying, "My former employer is alleging that a former trader stole millions of $$$. I'm just waiting on them to say that I'm the thief so I can sue them." With that story, I'm surprised employers aren't beating down his door to give him a job.