Message-ID: <22571439.1075860883354.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:16:21 -0700 (PDT) From: ron.matthews@enron.com To: doug.cebryk@enron.com, kevin.hyatt@enron.com Subject: RE: Panda Energy Extension Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Matthews, Ron X-To: Cebryk, Doug , Hyatt, Kevin X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kevin_Hyatt_Mar2002\Hyatt, Kevin\Projects\Sun Devil X-Origin: Hyatt-K X-FileName: khyatt (Non-Privileged).pst Doug, You're right!! Pipe size can swing the costs substantially. May be able to go down to a 20" or 24" depending on flow. Once I have a volume, I can size the line in a matter of minutes. 100 vs 450 MMcf/d makes a BIG difference. I'll leave the guess work of flow up to Kevin. Ron M. -----Original Message----- From: Cebryk, Doug Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:12 PM To: Hyatt, Kevin Cc: Matthews, Ron Subject: Panda Energy Extension Kevin Do you want a cost estimate for the Panda Energy extension for the Cavern to the tie-in point. It is 35.4 miles long , and we need to rethink/confirm the 36" size based on volume, as every inch in diameter adds substantial cost. Thanks