Message-ID: <25159761.1075842212247.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT) From: dan.hyvl@enron.com To: barbara.gray@enron.com Subject: Re: ECT and HPLR contracts not to be transferred to HPL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dan J Hyvl X-To: Barbara N Gray X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Barbara, This relates to our meeting last Thursday when I asked Brenda if the Entex Gas Marketing transactions stayed with Janet Wallis. It is my understanding that the Entex traders for both Entex and Entex Gas Marketing are sometimes the same. I recall times when Janet would request a deal under Entex and then Entex would move the transaction to Entex Gas Marketing. They have also gone the other way on some deals. The same is possible with Southern Union Gas Company and Mercado in Galveston and Port Arthur. I raised the question because these may occur at or behind the city gate delivery point. Brenda said that she was going to ask the business group how they wanted to handle Entex Gas Marketing and Mercado. Barbara N Gray 05/26/99 01:49 PM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: ECT and HPLR contracts not to be transferred to HPL dan please explain why you think that the entex gas marketing k and mercad gas services k should remain in ect.