Message-ID: <30800283.1075842227254.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 02:31:00 -0800 (PST) From: dan.hyvl@enron.com To: ellen.wallumrod@enron.com Subject: Re: New Deals Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dan J Hyvl X-To: Ellen Wallumrod X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Ellen, With this added information, can you generate the contemplated confirmation? ----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:29 AM ----- Janet H Wallis 12/12/2000 09:57 AM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: New Deals Forget the greenhouse requirements and just make it requirements up to 50 MMbtu a day. The meter number is #1598. Also, the GTC method is fine with me. Thanks, J Dan J Hyvl 12/12/2000 09:44 AM To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: New Deals Janet, Two items regarding the Panther deal. What is meant by "Greenhouse requirements"? New delivery point, can be get a better description about this point, is it currently in existence, if so, how was it put in, who was the deal maker for the installation, etc. After this information is provided, I see no reason why this shouldn't be documented by the confirm desk using a standard GTC confirm. Janet H Wallis 12/12/2000 09:17 AM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: New Deals Panther I will send the Entex deal later, thanks. Janet