Message-ID: <30910558.1075842233480.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:15:00 -0800 (PST)
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: janet.wallis@enron.com
Subject: Re: City of San Antonio
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dan J Hyvl
X-To: Janet H Wallis
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

	Janet H Wallis
	02/08/2001 01:51 PM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: City of San Antonio

Dan, istead of assigning the contract I would prefer to set up another 
contract under HPLC and assign that one.
What do you think?  I understood that the purchaser of HPl was to get all 
Texas deals and since this was in ENA for regulatory reasons, just like 
Entex, it would be assigned to the new marketing entity that was being set 
up.  Has something changed so that these utility accounts are not going to 
the purchaser of HPL business?
Also, I need to amend the Southern union contract  at Austin (Colorado River 
Sation) to refect a swap from index to fixed price.  Can someone send me the 
original deal so that I can see what needs to be amended?

Feb 01
5,000 a day 
$6.28 + .199 instead of Index + .199



Dan J Hyvl
02/08/2001 11:17 AM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: City of San Antonio

After months of email negotiations, the Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale 
Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and The City of San Antonio, 
action through the City Public Service Board has been signed.  Just in time 
to assign to the new entity being set up for the non HPL Texas deals that 
need to remain separate from HPL.