Message-ID: <25658650.1075842279368.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:59:00 -0800 (PST) From: dan.hyvl@enron.com To: sandi.braband@enron.com Subject: Re: Tri[ple Lutz ENA contracts Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dan J Hyvl X-To: Sandi M Braband X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Sandi, As you know, I am out of the loop relating to the assignment issue. I believe that George Weismann needs to give us an updated list of contracts that currently exist together with a list of contracts that need to be put in place to match the ENA contracts that ENA now intends to keep, but HPL also wants. The assignment issue has gotten very complicated. I think that ENA wants us to enter into new contracts with the counterparties. I do not think that there are any ENA contracts which need to be assigned to HPL. There are certain contracts that need to be assigned to the new HPL marketing company, these being the contracts with Entex, etc., after we decide how ENA also wants to keep the right to do business with these entities. We probably need a meeting with George to get updated information on what needs to be done. Sandi M Braband 03/07/2001 09:30 AM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Tri[ple Lutz ENA contracts Dan, I am preparing the assignments of ENA contracts going into Lodisco as well as those going to HPL. The PSA at exhibit 4.13 (x) lists those going to Lodisco. Is that still accurate? If not, can you forward to me an updated list? Also, is there a list of those ENA contracts that are to be assigned to HPL rather than Lodisco? Let me know-- Thanks, Sandi