Message-ID: <3208428.1075842284889.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 01:03:00 -0700 (PDT) From: dan.hyvl@enron.com To: phil.demoes@enron.com Subject: Re: FW: FORM: BILATERAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dan J Hyvl X-To: Phil DeMoes X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: HYVL-D X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf Phil, Please let them know that all of their proposed changes are acceptable. Let me know if they are going to create original and bring it down signed or do they intend to do something else. Phil DeMoes/ENRON@enronXgate 05/30/2001 07:55 AM To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: FORM: BILATERAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT -----Original Message----- From: "Bailey, Donna" @ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Bailey+2C+20Donna+22+20+3Cdbailey+40balch+2Ecom+3E+40ENR ON@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 5:10 PM To: Demoes, Phil; dan.hyvl@enron.com Cc: Alan M. Kilpatrick Subject: FORM: BILATERAL CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT <> Per the request of Alan Kilpatrick, I am forwarding to you Southern's comments on your proposed confidentiality agreement. As you can see, they are almost entirely editorial and relate to the inclusion of seemingly duplicative provisions. The one substantive point is that we do not agree to venue provisions, although we will agree in this case to Texas choice of law. Please let us know if these changes are acceptable in advance of the Thursday meeting. - FFG901_.doc