Message-ID: <32468611.1075858952934.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT) From: christina.finelli@enron.com To: mike.smith@enron.com Subject: Re: New Power Company Amendment Cc: james.keller@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: james.keller@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com X-From: Finelli, Christina X-To: Smith, Mike X-cc: Keller, James , Jones, Tana X-bcc: X-Folder: \TJONES (Non-Privileged)\Jones, Tana\Inbox X-Origin: Jones-T X-FileName: TJONES (Non-Privileged).pst Is there a chance that the one amendment referring to gas was executed and the other one referring to energy/power for some reason did not get executed? Christy Enron Energy Services From: Mike D Smith 09/28/2001 09:21 AM To: Christina Finelli/HOU/EES@EES cc: James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Tana Jones/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Re: New Power Company Amendment Remember that the power and gas amendments look on their face to be identical documents, and you have to read very closely to see that they are indeed different. Are we sure that we are not looking at 2 different docs--a gas one and a power one--and concluding that they are the same and therefore that we are missing one? Christina Finelli 09/28/2001 09:19 AM To: James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES cc: Tana Jones/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: New Power Company Amendment Documentum just called back. They said they manually reviewed everything that has not yet been scanned into the system and cannot find any Agreements or Amendments for New Power Company. I have checked with Karen Cordova since her initials are on the document to see if possibly she had any extra documents, and she does not. I doubt we will be able to get an executed copy of this Amendment. Christy